A Semantics for Nominal Comparatives
نویسنده
چکیده
This work adopts the perspective of plural logic and measurement theory in order rst to focus on the microstructure of comparative determiners; and second, to derive the properties of comparative determiners as these are studied in Generalized Quantiier Theory, locus of the most sophisticated semantic analysis of natural language determiners. The work here appears to be the rst to examine comparatives within plural logic, a step which appears necessary, but which also harbors speciic analytical problems examined here. Since nominal comparatives involve plural and mass reference, we begin with a domain of discourse upon which a lattice structure (Link's) is imposed , and which maps (via abstract dimensions such as weight in kilograms) to concrete measures (in N,R+). The mapping must be homomorphic and Archimedean. Comparisons begin as simple predicates on dimensions or measures ; from these we derive classes of predicates on the domain, i.e., generalized determiners (quantiiers), and show, e.g., how monotonicity properties follow in the derivation. This results in a proposal for a logical language which includes derived determiners, and which is an attractive target for semantics interpretation; it also turns out that some interesting comparative determin-ers are rst order, at least when restricted to nonparametric and noncollective predications.
منابع مشابه
Hidden Nominal Structures in Japanese Clausal Comparatives
Recent debates on Japanese clausal comparatives have yielded several competing theories of their syntax and semantics with different implications for the issue of crosslinguistic variation in comparative constructions. This paper offers a novel syntactic account of Japanese clausal comparatives. It claims that despite their appearance, Japanese clausal comparatives in fact involve a nominal str...
متن کاملMeasuring and Comparing Individuals and Events
This squib investigates parallels between nominal and verbal comparatives. Building on key insights of Hackl (2001) and Bale and Barner (2009), we show that more behaves uniformly when it combines with nominal and verbal predicates: (i) it cannot combine with singular count NPs or perfective telic VPs; (ii) grammatical properties of the predicates determine the scale of comparison–plural marked...
متن کاملMeasurement and Interadjective Comparisons
This paper shows the relevance of measurement theory for the linguistic analysis of comparative statements. In particular, the paper focusses on interadjective comparatives like ‘x is P -er than y is Q’ and comparatives involving multidimensional adjectives. It is argued that Bale’s (2008) recent proposal to account for such comparatives is rather limited, and just one way to account for intera...
متن کاملInternal and Interval Semantics for CP-Comparatives
The interval degree semantics for clausal (CP)-comparatives given in [5] is shown to be equivalent to a point degree semantics in which the CPexternal degree relation is interpreted internal to the CP.
متن کاملDescriptive Semantics of the Nominal Hapax Legomenon of the Word Menhaj and the Pathology of its Three Translations (Meybodi, Makarem Shirazi and Ansarian)
Understanding the Quran depends upon appreciating meanings of the single words and concepts that are interconnected and interrelated like a chain. Nominal hapax legomenon in the Quran is a word that occurs only once in the holy Quran. Hence, such words need semantic scrutiny since they are difficult to understand. Accordingly, understanding hapax legomenons calls for examining and identifying t...
متن کامل